That's silly. Filibusters not part of consideration of judicial nominees for most of our nation's history. Not necessary for stable normhttps://twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/848928865477160961 …
I think it is true though, but only in relation to the Garland precedent, not in relation to the filibuster
-
-
There's still a window for a deal governing treatment of nominees under divided govt.
-
Yes, in King's Landing, perhaps?
-
Ha! If Grassley wanted, I suspect he could craft bipartisan deal to govern post-2020 election, but would have to do it in next year or so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.