702 probably isn't even the authority that fed into the supposed intelligence reports Nunes reviewed at the White House.
-
-
Replying to @dnvolz
So why is Nunes + other hawkish Republicans suddenly threatening to jeopardize reauthorization of 702, which expires at the end of the year?pic.twitter.com/sYZeQjQfyh
2 replies 4 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
If this is all an attempt to distract from the Russia probe/cover for Trump, I'm not sure it is working.
3 replies 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
Dustin Volz Retweeted Julian Sanchez
But dyed in the wool surveillance reformers feel more emboldened than ever that they can get wins this yearhttps://twitter.com/normative/status/847576945382633472 …
Dustin Volz added,
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
Which is stunning. Virtually no one thought serious FISA reform was possible under Trump OR Clinton with GOP in control of House+Senate
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
If Nunes is trying to use FISA reform as some sort of bargaining chip to scare away the leaks and investigations, it may blow up in his face
2 replies 5 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
Thanks to Nunes it looks more likely that valuable spy tools responsible for ~25% of foreign intel could expire, or real FISA reform happens
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
Unless Nunes truly desires FISA reform now, those are not good options for a HPSCI chairman.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
The fact that he is willing to suggest FISA Section 702 is at all in jeopardy at all is bananas. He is the HPSCI chairman!
2 replies 5 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @dnvolz
An anecdote: In 2015, Nunes+his staffers wanted "more for national security" to support USA Freedom's NSA reforms, several sources said
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.