Two of the big stories this week are: 1: Confirmation fight over Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch 2: Trump move to undo climate regulation
-
-
For example, in his now-famous Chevron opinion, Gorsuch expressed concerns about agencies dramatically reversing course
-
But the Clean Power Plan itself is only viable becaus of Chevron deference, no?
-
I think it depends on how courts approach it
-
Right, but with regard to Gorsuch, wouldn't he strike down Clean Power Plan altogether, since he presumably would like to overrule Chevron?
-
If CPP were to get to the court, that is possible, but it wouldn't need to be via Chevron
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.