I'm all in favor of streaming arguments because I can lie on my bed and listen to them like I did just now instead of schlepping to court
-
-
Seems likely to me Trump may just stop all immigration as a giant middle finger to the "discrimination" concept.
-
that he couldn't do, unless there is no judiciary branch anymore
-
Why not?
-
you see the legaly problems with 7 countries alone. a total stop would, under "normal" circumstances, not work
-
Total ban would completely destroy 2 main arguments in opposition--Estab. Clause and §1152 statutory argument.
-
but then there'll be other arguments. as long as the judiciary branch "oficially" exists, I have hope
-
There is no constitutional/statutory argument against total ban. Judiciary can't just strike it down bc it's bad
-
The only arguments against exec. immigration overreach would be on discrim. grounds. Total ban eliminates this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
another question if I may: why isn't there a case for the mental stability of the president?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I recognise those two facts but Trump has a flawed character that point to a mental problem. my opinion
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.