1) When the White House says these well covered attacks "did not receive adequate attention from Western media sources," it sounds like...
-
-
Replying to @jswatz
2) the cranks who write to say that the NYT didn't cover their pet topic. When I show them the actual coverage, they then respond that...
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @jswatz
3) it's not enough, or the paper didn't use precisely their preferred words. There's no winning that argument, because it's fact free.
2 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @jswatz
& if argument is that media didn't label as religious motivated, that's also bogus if media doesn't have evidence to support that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Especially if they are referencing breaking news where it's impossible to know
5:32 PM - 6 Feb 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.