If you are emailed a decision that is not available to the general public, and you don't make it available to them, then yes, you are.https://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/790918776472469504 …
-
-
well, this doesn't really apply to you, since you cover SCOTUS and it's easy to find those opinions quickly.
-
I agree with MJS. The public doesn't have PACER access. They deserve to have a link to the opinion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but lots of reporters who cover lower courts are simply emailed PDFs of decisions from the court or lawyers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
these reporters will often supply their summary of the decision without making the actual ruling freely available.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that, to me, is unacceptable. They should provide that text to the public alongside their own analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so the "you" in my tweet was not YOU, it's reporters who cover lower court decisions regularly without uploading them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.