Only ruling today was 5-3, but looks like it could easily have been 4-4, with Thomas concurring in the judgment.
-
-
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley Isn't it more likely that Scalia initially wrote, or voted to join, Thomas's concurrence in the judgment, so it was 6-3?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
Replying to @steve_vladeck
@steve_vladeck looking at CT's opinion, you may be right
7:31 AM - 30 Mar 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.