Sounds promising.https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/638464743062282240 …
-
-
Replying to @JameelJaffer
@JameelJaffer@benjaminwittes not sure why Reuters singled out here as it clearly was a win for NSA & story made clear it wasn't on merits2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley@JameelJaffer yeah, you're right. your story was less bad than the others, and the headline is vague enough not to be false.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes@JameelJaffer give us a break -- we only have 64 characters to work with!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley@JameelJaffer How about "DC Circuit Vacates Decision Striking Down NSA Surveillance"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes@JameelJaffer a lay reader wouldn't know what that means1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley@JameelJaffer okay, how about "DC Circuit Voids NSA Surveillance Decision"?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes@JameelJaffer that could work...though doesn't convey that gov't won2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley@benjaminwittes I agree it's hard to convey this in 64 characters. But some of these--eg BBC's--are inexcusable.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JameelJaffer @benjaminwittes I speak only for my story....
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.