... The potential compromise being no nationwide right, but requiring states to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere. #ReutersSCOTUS
-
-
@lawrencehurley@David_Ingram@ReutersLegal Will listen later, but what were the responses? -
.
@kkaplan lawyer for plaintiffs said there'd be concerns about "coercion and consent and disrupting family relationships"#ReutersSCOTUS -
.
@kkaplan In other words, no, it would not mean other types of marriage would be allowed#ReutersSCOTUS -
@lawrencehurley I can see that rationale work for incest, but 1st cousins? How?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.