#ReutersSCOTUS since JGR silent, key q for me: How and how closely did AMK question the govt? Did he tell SG he thought text was clear?
-
-
Replying to @davidgweininger
.
@davidgweininger Kennedy did not say one way or the other on that point#ReutersSCOTUS1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley Is that not significant given that earlier in arg he mused that the statute was clear *against* the govt?#ReutersSCOTUS1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgweininger
.
@davidgweininger I don't think so...#ReutersSCOTUS1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley I'll ask differently: what point did AMK emphasize in questioning the govt? Coercion? Textualism? Chevron?#ReutersSCOTUS1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgweininger
.
@davidgweininger Kennedy did not discuss Chevron at all. Roberts briefly mentioned it.#ReutersSCOTUS1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley Ummm...so, coercion? *What* did he ask? is what I'm looking for.#ReutersSCOTUS2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@davidgweininger Yes, coercion and whether court should invoke constitutional avoidance #ReutersSCOTUS
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.