#ReutersSCOTUS since JGR silent, key q for me: How and how closely did AMK question the govt? Did he tell SG he thought text was clear?
-
-
@lawrencehurley Is that not significant given that earlier in arg he mused that the statute was clear *against* the govt?#ReutersSCOTUS -
.
@davidgweininger I don't think so...#ReutersSCOTUS -
@lawrencehurley I'll ask differently: what point did AMK emphasize in questioning the govt? Coercion? Textualism? Chevron?#ReutersSCOTUS -
.
@davidgweininger Kennedy did not discuss Chevron at all. Roberts briefly mentioned it.#ReutersSCOTUS -
@lawrencehurley Ummm...so, coercion? *What* did he ask? is what I'm looking for.#ReutersSCOTUS -
.
@davidgweininger Kennedy's concerns was that a ruling for the govt would unconstitutionally commandeer states#ReutersSCOTUS -
@JoanBiskupic Wait - a ruling FOR the govt wld commandeer states? I thought it'd have gone the other way.#ReutersSCOTUS -
.
@davidgweininger It would force states to establish exchanges to get the subsidies.#ReutersSCOTUS - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.