Why did JK Rowling let people think she was a dude for so long? Check out this graph:... http://fb.me/2lXG8Klay
-
-
Replying to @ilyseh
Extra-sad - more women read MT “
@ilyseh: Why did JK Rowling let people think she was a dude for so long? This graph: http://fb.me/2lXG8Klay ”1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReutersZengerle
@ReutersZengerle Not quibbling with data, but I don't think NY Review or NYer would be reviewing Harry Potter. George Eliot a better example2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
@lawrencehurley sorry no. It's a heinous imbalance, and more women read. Also this: http://m.newyorker.com/archive/2000/07/31/2000_07_31_074_TNY_LIBRY_000021373 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ReutersZengerle
@ReutersZengerle I agree about the imbalance, but not that Rowling should be seen as standard bearer. Lots of better women writers!
7:27 AM - 13 Apr 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.