NEW: Senator Durbin has distributed newly released emails that he says cast doubt on Kavanaugh’s 2006 testimony concerning his role in a controversial judicial nomination when he worked in Bush White Housepic.twitter.com/Bvtdwncuth
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
In response, White House points to this exchange from same hearing in 2006 in which Kavanaugh says to Sen Schumer that he probably was involved in Haynes discussion but refuses to say whether he supported the nominationpic.twitter.com/L1eSjkVQJr
Very weak sauce, especially since we know what "handle" meant in this context.
It’s embarrassing to just transcribe Durbin’s claim as if it has merit. It’s not even sauce.
What's the current count on false statements under oath? I bet he blew past even McGahn's over/under.
So, a bunch of non sequitur.
"Re: Gay marriage issues" is an interesting subject line for an invitation to join a foursome with William Haynes.
Oh no, not golf
You have a difficult time differentiating between "handle" and "weighed in on" ??? Seriously? I'm not even a lawyer (I make an honest living) and I can "handle" that.
What does Haynes himself say?
Not handling doesn’t mean not involved. I mean really this is getting absurd
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.