STORY: Supreme Court nominee emails reignite Democratic query on past testimonyhttps://reut.rs/2CMipgs
-
-
Show this thread
-
In summary, Kavanaugh said at 2006 hearing he did not "handle" the Haynes nomination, but the new emails suggest he certainly weighed in on it (and was invited by Alberto Gonzales to play golf with Haynes)
Show this thread -
In response, White House points to this exchange from same hearing in 2006 in which Kavanaugh says to Sen Schumer that he probably was involved in Haynes discussion but refuses to say whether he supported the nominationpic.twitter.com/L1eSjkVQJr
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So, what you’re saying is, he was completely honest and the documents back that up? Seems like the real story is these senators that keep releasing half truths and lies to deceive the American people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does “accross-the-board judicial conservative” mean calling all balls or all strikes? This whole thing is such a farce.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just because a democrat says something, doesn't mean you have to repeat what they said like it's a fact. Although you have plausible deniability, your profession doesn't really have the credibility to back that up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. He hasn't. Cool story though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Believe me, he will be confirmed! Greetings from Germany!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Narrator: But they do no such thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is beyond disingenuous
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.