Judge rules: plaintiffs "convincingly argued that the term “emolument” in both the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses, with slight refinements that the Court will address, means any “profit,” “gain,” or “advantage”
-
-
Show this thread
-
As such, plaintiffs "have stated claims to the effect that the President, in certain instances, has violated both the Foreign and Domestic Clauses."
Show this thread -
Judge gives both sides 21 days to make recommendations on "next steps" in what is a novel issue for a court to delve into
Show this thread -
And parties also asked to weigh in on what is likely to be the key issue: "the general outline of any proposed discovery"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.