Looking for bias where none exists. Supreme Court coverage routinely refers to "narrow" or "broad" decisions based on the scope of the ruling not on the vote breakdown. All is made clear in the stories that are beneath the headlines if people can be bothered to read themhttps://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1003646907896430592 …
-
Show this thread
-
Funny I didn't get spammed when I put this headline out in May 2016: U.S. top court hands narrow win to Spokeo in class action case - Reuters News Vote was 6-2
2 replies 4 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @lawrencehurley
That’s more clear than most of the headlines yesterday, most of which were intentionally murky to mislead laymen & you know it. Your disingenuous, triggered tweetstorm proves suchpic.twitter.com/7LUT9ViWRF
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.