Looking for bias where none exists. Supreme Court coverage routinely refers to "narrow" or "broad" decisions based on the scope of the ruling not on the vote breakdown. All is made clear in the stories that are beneath the headlines if people can be bothered to read themhttps://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1003646907896430592 …
Hmm so in what way would any of that “expose” so-called political bias?
-
-
I would say I understand completely why you would think this bc your reading of narrow is reasonable. Then explain what I mean by it. Then in further communications try to change the message to avoid confusion. If interested in appealing to more consumers of course
-
Final version of story is very different to original take:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-baker/u-s-supreme-court-backs-christian-baker-who-rebuffed-gay-couple-idUSKCN1J01WU …
-
It is, and is very good
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.