Looking for bias where none exists. Supreme Court coverage routinely refers to "narrow" or "broad" decisions based on the scope of the ruling not on the vote breakdown. All is made clear in the stories that are beneath the headlines if people can be bothered to read themhttps://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1003646907896430592 …
-
-
Or this one in June 2014: U.S. top court issues narrow ruling on software patents - Reuters News Vote was 9-0
Show this thread -
And as
@sam_baker points out, perhaps you remember that "narrow" ruling in which the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage across the United States on a 5-4 vote?Show this thread -
Or maybe those "narrow" rulings that struck down on a 5-4 vote a key part of the Voting Rights Act and upheld Obamacare's individual mandate?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s more clear than most of the headlines yesterday, most of which were intentionally murky to mislead laymen & you know it. Your disingenuous, triggered tweetstorm proves suchpic.twitter.com/7LUT9ViWRF
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.