@fozmeadows Since you compare this to people shouting down diversity concerns, you do need to know what diverse authors are saying.
-
-
Replying to @courtneymilan
.
@courtneymilan I'm comparing this to people saying outsiders don't get to talk about their stuff.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fozmeadows
@fozmeadows We're not saying she can't. We're saying her critique lacks the information to be anything other than generalized and naive.1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @courtneymilan
@courtneymilan And yet nobody that I've seen has said her analysis of her given examples is inaccurate. It's all framing and right to speak.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
@fozmeadows I have not seen anyone say she's not allowed to speak. Just that we think her words don't make sense.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @courtneymilan
@courtneymilan The implication seems to be that, as she admits being an outsider to the romance genre, she shouldn't have written the piece.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
@fozmeadows No. It's that she should literally have read one romance before critiquing the genre.2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @courtneymilan
@courtneymilan This is what's getting me: romance & its tropes are so omnipresent, you CAN'T restrict their discussion to genre-insiders.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fozmeadows
@fozmeadows That is not true. I was unaware of genre romance tropes before starting to read it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lawless523
@lawless523 Okay, but that's not true of everyone?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@fozmeadows As a lawyer, if I argued w/o citation or facts to back me up, I'd be laughed out of court. Otherwise, it's all just opinion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.