Quantitative Editor, @FiveThirtyEight | PhD, @LSEGovernment | 
in 
, via 
| she/her
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
b) transparency is generally good, both to bolster trust in process and because it allows for errors to be corrected, and c) errors are more likely with manual counting/paper ballots etc, but d) public errors undermine trust in the process, and...
e) the election tech we have so far is bad and manual counting/paper ballots might still be the best way to do things... basically, the only way to square transparency & reliability in reporting with a slow and error-prone process is to not report results quickly.
In other words, if we can only have two out of [speed, reliability, transparency], it seems to me that it's much preferable to sacrifice speed than transparency or reliability. If it takes a week to validate results such that they can be reported, that seems worth it.
I am a programmer. There are fundamental reasons why computers cannot securely and accurately count votes. This is not changeable. Manual counting of paper ballots will always be the best way to do it. Programmers keep saying this, but nobody listens.
#TulsiGabbard keeps saying it too, and she has legislation for it, her Securing America's Elections Act that NONE of the other candidates 4 POTUS have signed on to yet. And since she is enduring a #TulsiMediaBlackout, the public isn't aware of it either!!! #StandWithTulsi
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
