in 
, via 
| she/her
Did you see the rounding error of 3.4 to 4 for Pete on this Iowa caucus card? https://mobile.twitter.com/bhalle87/status/1224550111725916160 …https://twitter.com/bhalle87/status/1224550111725916160 …
It's amazing how much you can find in entrance poll cross tabs given enough time
-
-
-
When each were rounded, only 7 delegates would be assigned. So, to decide who gets the eighth delegate, you see who is closest to getting another. By looking at the decimal part of the calculation, Pete’s “.4” is closer than the others’ “.3” each. So, he gets the last one.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I started doing qualitative political analysis in the (late) 1980s, and I'm impressed you are still coming up with interesting insights from the entrance poll as it approaches 2 am. They are more meaningful than the "winner", given the thousands of ways to spin these results.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.