Quantitative Editor, @FiveThirtyEight | PhD, @LSEGovernment | 
in 
, via 
| she/her
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
What do we know about voters who say they're not that certain about their opinion on whether Trump has committed an impeachable offense? @ameliatd and I find that while they may be persuadable, they're also paying less attention:https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/some-americans-look-persuadable-on-impeachment-but-theyre-not-paying-attention/ …
They're more likely to say they're ideologically moderate (45% compared to 34% for people who are certain) and less likely to watch Fox News or MSNBC (16%, compared to 30% of certain people -- with a bonus ugly chart 
).pic.twitter.com/ICr4nmxW39
Among Republicans, those who are less certain are also more likely to believe that Trump conditioned military aid on an investigation (39% compared to 21%) and that he tried to cover up his actions (49% compared to 18%) -- which might mean that they could be swayed.
But the real challenge will be getting these less certain people to pay attention. They're less likely to be following the impeachment process closely, and they're less likely to have watched the hearings (13% compared to 25%).pic.twitter.com/QFSuzkqnIK
Why not skip this and start asking how many Rs would support a Pence Presidency. It’s the only real result that comes from all this. Pence v Trump.
I really don't see how people could actually accept Pence because of his trump association. He is not innocent of this. Let's skip this and ask if the media will still try to push a republican to be president in 2020 after all we have seen from these people in the last 3 years.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
