The error (comparing the parties' polling average 33 days before the election, i.e. today, to their election results) was particularly high -- Labour was 13.5 percentage points off their eventual result.pic.twitter.com/OidHKIaUZ4
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The error (comparing the parties' polling average 33 days before the election, i.e. today, to their election results) was particularly high -- Labour was 13.5 percentage points off their eventual result.pic.twitter.com/OidHKIaUZ4
I'm always on the side of emphasizing uncertainty! But also, there's always a tendency to overlearn the lessons from the last election -- and in this case, the last election seems like it was a bit of an outlier. Data fromhttps://liberalarts.utexas.edu/government/faculty/cw26629#datasets-on-polls-and-the-timeline-of-elections …
May I ask what you used for the visualization here? R? Love the legibility.
Yep! ggplot in R. Thanks!
Other psephologists have mentioned 2017 and 2019 have a similarly unusual amount of undecided voters at this point in the campaign. Do you have a comparison for that?
Of course; it's a bit like when Liverpool came back from 3-0 down to beat AC Milan. Every time a major team was 3-0 down at half time that fightback was mentioned and always will be. But it never happened and won't happen again (probably).
Excellent. Always god to get a @FiveThirtyEight perspective over here. More please! @NateSilver538
Interesting & instructive, but of all elections, might 2019 be even more unpredictable given the headline single issue that divides the main parties (except LibDems)? Only time will tell. I know I’ve never hesitated to vote (for whichever party) but have no idea this time.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.