Graphs are supposed to visually convey data that is too hard to read, not the other way around.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Im
possible
to
read
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bernie Sanders also at 16.8% final #? So tied for second with Harris?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Avid fan of 538. But... this chart is too complicated...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a fair number of people overwhelmed by this presentation style. For those critiquing, I do wish they would offer a better alternative rather than just bashing.
-
I hear you, but they aren’t data viz professionals so they don’t know a solution, they just understand this is visually confusing. To me it just looks like trying to cram too much info into too small a space. Esp for mobile. They could break it into a series of charts
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Worth noting that
@ewarren was the only candidate to *both* increase their favorable *and* decrease their unfavorable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the worst graph/chart I have ever seen. Incredibly difficult to follow. A simple line graph would have been much easier to read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These graphs are literally giving me motion sickness...I can’t tell wtf is going on?!?!
-
Vertical Lines are percentage of people who said they would vote for a candidate if elections were today. Horizontal lines show how much people shifted from one candidate to another. The thicker the line the more voters shifted from one candidate to the other
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in
, via
| she/her