To its great credit analytic metaphysics is unabashedly wacky. What I like about this is that it makes clear that the fully spelled out consequences of rejecting Nāgārjuna are actually considerably less plausible than accepting universal emptiness. E.g.:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11229-017-1410-3 …
-
"if there is normativity, there is normativity all the way down" Well, the antecedent is false, so...
-
-
I figured that's what you meant, but I don't know how to put lines above my "a"s, so I expressed the thesis my own way.
-
You only learn that one in the 47th house of Shaolin.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.