"if there is normativity, there is normativity all the way down" Well, the antecedent is false, so...
To its great credit analytic metaphysics is unabashedly wacky. What I like about this is that it makes clear that the fully spelled out consequences of rejecting Nāgārjuna are actually considerably less plausible than accepting universal emptiness. E.g.:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11229-017-1410-3 …
-
-
-
Yes, I think this paper's thesis is (as stated) true!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you say what you see as a rejection of Nāgārjuna?! I mean, this looks wacky, but I seem to have missed something
-
Of the 3 background premises my sense is that (1) believing in fundamentally normative properties is a rejection of universal emptiness, and (2) believing in grounding is a rejection of various elements of Nāgārjuna. My credence in (1) is about .7 and in (2) about .6.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.