"Scholarship that aims to support social movements and political progress has more reason and responsibility to maintain strict epistemic and methodological standards than disinterested scholarship, not less." - Great point in great review of The Man Not. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.apaonline.org/resource/collection/950518C1-3421-484C-8153-CDA6ED737182/BlackV17n2.pdf …
Ah I am not sure. My guess: people lower their standards for work they agree with, raise it for work they disagree with, so the net effect hard to work out and a lot depends on context of evaluation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.