Here’s an argument I find odd mainly because I lack sense of what the normative pattern for citations should be? Guess: citations should track engagement. If so it suggests interventions on citations (breaking engagement link) would be counter productive. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/04/27/racial-exclusions-scholarly-citations-opinion …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @lastpositivist
Tracking engagement is too weak; it should also (a) acknowledge priority and (b) known objections.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @nescio13
Hmm I think citations should track engagement and there should be a norm to the effect that one engage with important known objections. (Not all known objections, judgement required.) That said I agree that acknowledging priority is important - and may come apart from engagement.
6:44 AM - 28 Apr 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.