(Result is: upon a non-white-man being promoted to CEO, white male top managers i ) identify less with & do less for company ii ) esp. do less to help out non-white-men peers. They didn't look at reaction of non-white-men top managers, but I bet it's the same.)
Presuming this goes for my own case is somewhat disheartening (that said, there are no doubt cultural differences between CEOs and academic #philosophy). It's not a new thought, these results aren't all that surprising, but it is hard to respond to.
http://ns.umich.edu/Releases/2018/Feb18/One-step-forward-two-steps-back-study-20180213.pdf?_ga=2.258275914.1516263782.1520783482-1834316381.1520783482 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
((Think their take is that this partly general "dislike the out group" thing so predict folk who share salient identities with promoted CEO will be different, others act as white men do. My bet is it's to do with belief in natural hierarchies, so I'd predict same from everyone.))
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think there is a range of probable non-racial explanations of these findings we need to consider, from a Bayesian, evolutionary, and game-theoretical perspective. (1/15)
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does it bother you that the URL has "One step forward, two steps back," while the title of the paper is "One step forward, one step back"? Not that it bothers me at all. [[Nervous twitching]]
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.