You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
...Actually I read on, this is just agitprop not worth arguing with. Quillette sometimes posts serious, interesting, thoughtful pieces and sometimes stuff saying literary academics are all pseudo-Marxists so hostile to the Enlightenment; i.e. just conservative rage machine fluff.
Is it just that they break this out when they have a slow news day or something?
I think I agree that few people read Hayek. People think they know what Hayek said, but really they know Friedman...so they miss out on the best parts of his philosophy of science. (I didn’t read the OP, in light of your comments)
Ah you should give it a read, maybe I misjudged. Definitely the case that Friedman (esp. that essay on instrumentalism) is read. But my strong impression is: Use of Knowledge is a pieces which, like, it counts against you not to know, in the Polite Society of phil social science.
Where are these mysterious almost-readable Quillette articles? Is it hidden behind the ‘race realism’ trash they churn out?
I haven’t archived stuff I like and don’t now have time to look, no skin off my back if you don’t like anything by them. But to be clear, I didn’t say “almost” readable, I offered straightforward praise.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
