Question for folk in cultural analysis: how are our methods of inquiry and argument different from Peterson’s? He reads a buncha stuff then impressionistically weaves them together with Jung. I think some of his critics differ from him only in chancing upon different conclusions.
-
But even in those (rare) instances when he reads critically, he seems unaware of or unconcerned with legitimate differences of opinion among experts, and grandiosely presents himself as an expert.
Aye, he massively overrates (or in any case overstates) his own competence and expertise.
-
-
“Extraordinary self-confidence and displays of self-confidence…inspire confidence in others; pretensions of genius waken the conviction in others that they are indeed dealing with a genius.” -- Hannah Arendt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.