Now updated with more references, I'm reasonably happy with my introductory level summary of a prominent line of argument from feminist #philosophy of science!
http://sootyempiric.blogspot.com/2018/04/a-line-of-thought-in-feminist.html …
-
Nice. I’d note that while much of it is Longinoean, I don’t think she presupposes (4) feminism, so this would be a variant on her view. SSK is informed by fem at the structural level (pluralist and open to contextual value), but isn’t logically committed to any fem. premises.
Ah I don’t think it’s a presupposition, but it’s a claim defended on grounds of examining the history of science as well as looking at some candidate contextual principles for bridging evidence and conclusions.
-
-
That seems right. Pluralism is probably similarly derived, rather than supposed. Underdetermination, however, definitely is a presupposition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.