Nice. I’d note that while much of it is Longinoean, I don’t think she presupposes (4) feminism, so this would be a variant on her view. SSK is informed by fem at the structural level (pluralist and open to contextual value), but isn’t logically committed to any fem. premises.
Now updated with more references, I'm reasonably happy with my introductory level summary of a prominent line of argument from feminist #philosophy of science!
http://sootyempiric.blogspot.com/2018/04/a-line-of-thought-in-feminist.html …
-
-
-
Ah I don’t think it’s a presupposition, but it’s a claim defended on grounds of examining the history of science as well as looking at some candidate contextual principles for bridging evidence and conclusions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.