You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If we have any epistemic standards in academia case for colonialism article is obviously awful (https://sootyempiric.blogspot.com/2017/09/on-case-for-colonialism.html …). We don’t evenly apply standards, and we ought: but Oh So Concerned for free speech only ever Concerned to see more bigotry published. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Last-Fall-This-Scholar/242880 …
If there were defences of creationism & astrology then I might see them as believers in Feyerabendian epistemic anarchism but of course they’re never also appealing for more bad natural science. But we do get fawning interviews for poor incompetent bigots who can’t catch a break.
Try & ask yourself honestly, if you were a black person in academia and even mildly knowledgeable about history of racist scholarship, wouldn’t you suspect that the Oh So Concerned for free speech are just a front for the same old bigotry? And thereby be reluctant to join in?
I want the free speech movement to have more credibility, it’d suit my broader beliefs, but tbh every time I see something like this I entirely understand why they don’t.
"If we have any epistemic standards in academia"pic.twitter.com/6PLsl9RxPX
In Twitter's preview the headline cuts off at "Now He's Defending Hi..." Briefly thought he was leaning into the full modus ponens on your Blitzkrieg analogy.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
