You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
In Bad Old Days folk just did #philosophy of physics but called it philosophy of science. Then some brave soul decided to see how biology was doing. Through keen observation they discover it's literally not physics. So we learn our lesson and do philosophy of particular sciences
So goes a standard narrative. 1) whats a source for this that I could reference? 2) Does anybody have a sense of whether there is something we are supposed to have learned, and if so what, that is in tension with what one would think if one did disguised philosophy of physics?
this isn't perfectly responsive, but woodward's recent dialogue (yes really woodward wrote a dialogue) against analytic metaphysics seems to get at what one learns from an engagement with science as a whole rather than an imaginary picture of Fundamental Physics
"Whence Philosophy of Biology" by Jason Byron. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.591.8898&rep=rep1&type=pdf …
Relatedly, the distinction between historical sciences (e.g., geology) and experimental sciences. My favorite paper (even if not the source of the distinction) is Cleland’s: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/342455 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
