Is this necessarily a fallacy? It seems consistent to me to think that there are many of a certain type of person, but you can't identify which people are of that type.
Planning a new blog post and so reading through some of my old, and gosh did this prediction come true: "I think we should all be prepared to see a lot of Informal Omega Inconsistency after the US election." http://sootyempiric.blogspot.com/2016/11/informal-omega-inconsistency.html …
-
-
-
Obviously sometimes it is possible to identify, but imho it's not per se inconsistent to say that you can identify that a general phenomenon exists but you can't identify with certainty any single instance
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.