Reading about spread of Confucianism in early modern Japan, amused by translators’ habit of discussing idea that ruler has Mandate of Heaven but literally not mentioning the further fact that if one lacks benevolence and humane rule then one loses mandate and may be replaced.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @lastpositivist
how often did that losing of the mandate actually happen? the Ender's Game series mentions this a lot (to Orson Scott Card's credit, the losing part is definitely in there)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FemisMusic
I know of 2 regime changes which Confucian scholars valorised as regime's cruelty leading mandate being passed to more humane rulers. More often what would happen is ru would remonstrate with a wayward government, and either change their behaviour or be killed for their defiance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lastpositivist
that's not nothing! how recent/distant are the examples you have in mind, historically?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmneMachin @FemisMusic
Aye I think remonstration is (a) the best and most inspiring part of Ruist tradition, and (b) in both its successes and noble failures far more common than regime change - the point is surely that in a well ordered state something so dramatic should not be necessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lastpositivist @AmneMachin
it would be nice if you could change things by means other than murder! weird thing about US politics is that the commitment to political change via death goes for pretty much the entire political spectrum
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FemisMusic @AmneMachin
The US frequently endorses regime change via bombs or assassins when working abroad (and there's cross party consensus on this), but at home at least there is - or was until worrying remarks of Trump towards the end of the campaign - a commitment to peaceful transition of power?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lastpositivist @AmneMachin
so yeah, depending on your politics, US people disagree about where violence can be performed (Third World, the hood) to whom (POC) and by whom (military, cops) but there don't tend to be many political persuasions opposed to violence as such. Quakers, SCLC are exceptions
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Huh, speaking for myself I have always found the pacifistic sentiment and aversion to coercion to be one of the most inspiring features of Confucianism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.