List chosen to represent my faves on both teams... and Heidegger.
Show this thread
Ok if we're going to have the Rationalism vs Romanticism debate all over again here are the teams: the Enlightenment Eagles (Condorcet, Carnap, R.Luxemburg, W.E.B. Du Bois, Dewey) Vs the Romantic Raptors (Herder, Goethe, Kierkegaard, Rorty, Heidegger). Rousseau is referee. Fight!
-
-
-
I also have a deep fear that I stole this from
@existentialcoms but can't remember the exact place, so everyone go and read that comic just to assuage my guilt.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Haha, high praise! :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think that chain of thought makes you a Raptor.
- Show replies
-
-
-
After running several models of this competition, my money is on the Eagles! Go Eagles!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The correct referee is Ernst Cassirer, Spinoza should replace Cordorcet on the Eagles, and Carl Jung should replace Rorty on the Raptors. 3/5.
-
Condorcet > Spinoza is not even hard, and I like Spinoza. But that's not close. The Jung angle is tempting but only to educate Jordan Peterson fans.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
don't make me pick between Luxemburg and Herder, that just seems so wrong (and obvs. Spinoza is the greatest rationalist just cos he's so weird on what reason is)
-
Life is full of hard choices, alas.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.