Folk in #philosophy a question for yinz. I always think of the canon as stuff there’s a normative expectation that someone finishing an undergrad degree (or at about that level) be familiar with. So it’s primarily a teaching category. Does this accord with your sense of the term?
-
-
Replying to @lastpositivist
I have opinions on this! I think of "the canon" as the backbone of grad school (1st 2 years of professionalization). I don't think it has much bearing on undergrad education & we're hurting our students by treating it as if it does or should.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @carl_b_sachs @sachs_carl
What do you think makes it good for graduates but not undergraduates?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lastpositivist
I guess because humanities grad school is professionalization & disciplinization & humanities undergrad ed is equipping people with cognitive & affective tools for being better citizens of a liberal democracy.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
But I guess I don't see the contrast here. Don't people think that there is stuff in Plato and Kant and Spinoza and what not that is ennobling and good for the citizenry in a democracy to be familiar with?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.