Liam Bright

does blackburn/gibbard quasi-realism count as realism in this context?

It’s, like, in the middle between plausible and magic, it’s the magnetism of meta ethical positions.

i'm kinda of confused about your own take. like, when you say 'i know what my commitments are' -- you've gotta be, like, the only person i ever met who knows what their commitments are

Try not to think of me as a hero.

e.g. you have a definite take on, like, repugnant conclusion stuff, that obviates any drive towards reflection?

on how to quantify well-being? on desire-satisfactions vs hedonics? on how to count the well-being of insects?

is there anyone on record that articulates a metaethical positions close to your take? i'm pretty startled and confused by this, it's so much more hardcore than anti moral anti-realism i know, and i identify as a moral anti-realist

Mackie is close. But I've never found a philosopher or poet who I think well expresses the truly normatively blank universe. (`Normative' to note that I think this goes for much more than morality. E.g. I also find it bizarre when people think there's real epistemic normativity.)