I wrote post on history of #philosophy and its relationship to current study: http://sootyempiric.blogspot.com/2017/11/philosophical-tradition-and-autonomy.html … One thing I presupposed is that philosophers should have a better explanation of why they do what they do than `it's a living'. I realise now that I have never defended that!
Also @jackhsamuel if you get a chance to read this post I'd be really interested to hear what you think.
-
-
I read it a week or so ago, but I’ll have to look again to come up with an opinion more developed than “huh, interesting”
-
I do recall having the sense that I wanted to question one of your premises, rather than agree/disagree straightforwardly, but I don’t think it was clear what premise or why. Just some vague unease with how it was framed, and the implicit conception of the activity of philosophy
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.