Aye, salience judgements are required.
-
Clarification b/c internet: none of this intended ad hominem! :)
Not taken as such, no worries! 
but it also doesn’t feel like a response to my post, which really wasn’t focused on outlining premises.
-
-
I took this as starting point, because from a hermeneutic stance the very idea that readers share assumptions with authors is ill-conceived.
-
Hmm, I mean, the focus is on defence of clarity norms. If it turns out those norms cannot involve too many premises outlined, what’s lost?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Writing as historian of philosophy whose job is unearthing hidden premises - and explaining why they were hidden to the author.
-
But the objection could be extended to what you call 'argumentative moves', I dare to guess.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.