People in #philosophy who make pronouncements about "the limits of #science" puzzle me - when did they solve the demarcation problem?
-
-
Replying to @lastpositivist
@lastpositivist Does talking re limits imply demarcation solved? I think we can know eg ethics beyond the limits without exact demarcation.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lastpositivist
@lastpositivist < as of now seems unlikely to include ethics. Can what is tell us what ought to be?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cathyby
@cathyby@lastpositivist Assumes (i) science can't study what ought to be; (ii) ethics isn't about what is (including facts about oughts).4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GuyLongworth
@GuyLongworth@lastpositivist < possible future. It's pretty impossible to predict exactly what science will do thousands years hence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cathyby
@cathyby@lastpositivist Not sure I agree to precisely that restriction. Anyway, not clear that current ethics ≠ current science.#Trolling1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GuyLongworth
@GuyLongworth I think science informs ethics. Don't know how science can provide the values.@lastpositivist1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @cathyby
@cathyby@lastpositivist But I take it that part of the question at issue is whether science can directly study value. Why not?#Trolling3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GuyLongworth
@GuyLongworth@cathyby@lastpositivist Because value is in the act of the agent (as more specifically beauty is in the eye of the beholder)!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@bowmanthebard @GuyLongworth @cathyby But why would that entail it cannot be scientifically studied? #Trolling...#OrAmI? (#Yes)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.