@CTRLtomDEL They say v.similar stuff. I can imagine having a preference for one or another, but not a pro-attitude to one but not the other.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL Reading Schlick seems an argument for continuity between Witt's work - historically he was influenced by young!Witttgenstein...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL ... but in his insistence that meaning = use & that ours is not to reform language but set straight the confused philosophers...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL ...it's not hard to see Schlick as prefiguring old!Wittgenstein as well.
#Wittgenstein#Schlick#Positivism#PhilosophyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL Well not clear what to conclude. Maybe Schlick didn't represent young!Wittgenstein but old!Wittgenstein came to resemble Shlick.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL Or maybe they're both just vague enough that you can read either into the other.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lastpositivist Schlick is awesome! Ever read 'The Voices of Wittgenstein '? -
@andrewpuzzo No I haven't read that! Where could I get my hands on it? - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL What prompted this was the opening of Problems of Ethics where Schlick outlines his metaphilosophy...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CTRLtomDEL ... but Schlick's paper on verificationalism (as he understands it) is also a good one
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.