@Amuly21 I've a similar reaction. Don't have any especial dislike for modifying classical logic but don't see the point of that modification
Hey #philosophyheads, any of you sympathetic to paraconsistent logic? Never actually met anyone into it, I'd like to hear your excuse...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Amuly21 Been having lots of talks about the relevance of aesthetic considerations to mathematical work! Am dubious, but acknowledge it...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@james_trafford Cheers for the replies. I am generally a pluralist with these things - I don't object in principle to PL...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@james_trafford ... it's just that, aside from explicitly reasoning about the paradoxes, when will you need full formal machinery of PL?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@james_trafford Explicitly reasoning about paradoxes doesn't seem worthwhile in itself - only good for (e.g.) informing us about mathsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.