Lea Raible

@laraible

Lecturer in Public Law | teach public law | research human rights, territory, secession, referendums | personal capacity | usual caveats

Glasgow, London
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2014.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @laraible

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @laraible

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    14. stu 2019.

    Overcoming my separation anxiety means I get to share some good news: It seems I wrote a book. "Human Rights Unbound: A Theory of Extraterritoriality" will be out with next year. I'm excited.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. velj

    One of the articles from Issue 1 is by Corina Heri This paper looks at one of the most interesting and challenging aspects of ECHR law - Article 18 (abusive limitation of rights). More and more cases fall under Art 18 and the law here is developing quickly.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    ⁩ post on recent editorial dramas at the Eur Law Journal —> What a Journal Makes: As we say goodbye to the European Law Journal | Verfassungsblog

    Poništi
  4. 4. velj

    Ah yes. I’ve been yelled at before for speaking Swiss German on the phone. To my mum who doesn’t live here. Should she speak in English to me too? Just to be on the safe side?

    Poništi
  5. 1. velj

    I watched Miss Americana so you don’t have to. Really, don’t. It’s terrible.

    Poništi
  6. 31. sij

    The Waitress of the Valley (Yes, I took some liberties, but trust me, this is the best it’s going to get with that dreadful combination.)

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    There seems to be a misunderstanding amongst some otherwise well-meaning British friends of mine, who are commiserating *me* for ‘losing my free movement rights’ today.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    I’m currently lecturing on the constitutional implications of . After I explained what retained EU law is, a student asked: but if it all still applies anyway, what’s the point of this? Fair point. Fair point indeed.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Looking forward to this later. Chatting about the steps the Court has taken in the right direction, and what it still needs to 'get done.'

    Poništi
  12. 27. sij

    Finally got round to reading it. It’s brilliant!

    Poništi
  13. 27. sij

    Sends email to self. Gets email. Thinks "Ohhhh, I wonder who that's from." Have a great Monday everyone.

    Poništi
  14. 23. sij

    'Action' is not a verb. That's the tweet.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Still processing the provisional measures order in v re but a few points: 1. Role of - requirement of periodic reporting - not sure it’s been quite this involved before?; 2. ref to UNGA resolutions - all that advocacy translates legally

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Today's decision is clearly a great result for and the . It should not be overlooked, however, that the ICJ rejected the request for an order to give UN investigators access to . This was not surprising, but the Court's explanation was minimal.

    Poništi
  17. 23. sij
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    GCILS’ very own will give a talk on Reappraising the Role of Experts in Recent Cases Before the ICJ, at ’s International Dispute Settlement Discussion Group's first seminar of this semester! Details & how to attend:

    Poništi
  19. 22. sij

    Agree with the sentiment, but would take issue with saying that a major economy in the EU has little control. Compared to most other countries it has rather a lot, I‘d say.

    Poništi
  20. 21. sij

    Moodle informs me I have earned a fire safety badge. I feel so accomplished. And it's only Tuesday.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    I raised this point last night but more can be read here: If the targeted killing can trigger a very short armed conflict...”Legally speaking, soldiers would always constitute legitimate targets, not only during an (already) ongoing armed conflict – a contra-intuitive result”.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·