It quite literally is NOT a violation of freedom of speech. I don’t see why this is so difficult to grasp. YouTube doesn’t have to let anyone post on their site. They can censor whoever they want.
-
-
All I know is I tried different things, lost my revenue, which amounts to censorship! I am NOT part of a network! I think my channel was attacked because I would not join a network!
-
This doesn't constitute a violation of rights under the constitution. This is just the price we're paying for not applying antitrust laws more readily over the last three decades. This misplace trust in markets is the cause of the problems we're seeing all over.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.