A world without masters is improbable and undesirable. I’d rather said masters be competent, sane, and efficient, as opposed to the endless stream of clown governments demotism has brought us.
-
-
This may seem shocking to you, but lots of people simply do not care for democracy nor it’s associated social ailments.
-
"I’d rather said masters be competent, sane, and efficient" The whole point of being a slave is you don't get to assert these preferences.
-
Do you seriously feel you have any capacity to assert any preferences now
-
Not as much as I'd like, but a king would be a move in the wring direction. But there are dictatorships you can move to.
-
Think more of a ceo. W/ voting powers allocated along lines of property ownership, economic power, and an emphasis on small scale political organization that allows for diverse models to compete. But I’m a rightist, and you are a leftist. There’s not really a point in continuing
-
Dictators aren’t accountable to their consumers/citizens. I think it’s perfectly possible have a strong executive and excuse messy interest group politics while still maintaining the social contract.
-
Governance is a service and like all services it should be subject to optimization via market competition. But we have fundamentally different conceptions of politics/reality and I highly doubt either of us will experience a conversion from a Twitter interaction.
-
It'll becomeva game of pure power and the market will be destroyed. The CEO's will become warlords. The market is pretty artifical. Something like that would probably work better with worker cooperatives.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.