-
-
nope, there were paid protesters. We took out for more details of hearing as it progressed (not room for everything!)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Really?? That's an incredible detail. How on earth do you leave it out of the story?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ccanipe
I wish we didn't have to cut, but there was a LOT to take in at that hearing. And not a lot of space to write.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why not leave it in the web version? Quietly cutting such an explosive detail fuels readers' worst assumptions.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JE_Gordon @ccanipe
this is a production issue; web version IS print version. But I can/will ask if possible to append.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kzernike @JE_Gordon
Accusations of paid protesters have been made by pres-elect and others. It's news if a confirmed case is documented.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Especially when it happens at a Senate confirmation hearing for a Trump nominee. Are you kidding me???
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
As a reader, I'm likely to assume it was removed bc it wasn't verifiable. And if true, it prob deserves it's own story.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
no. if it was wrong, we correct
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.