People are saying this is just more testing. No, it's not. We're still way low on testing. You can tell by cases per million. We're at 18.4. UK, which also isnt testing well, is at 28.8 Ones testing well: 111.8 to 314.8. Our data most likely at least 1/6 of actual US numbers.
-
-
Deze collectie tonenBedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
More testing = more cases too
-
We still are way way low on testing. You can tell this by number of cases per million. We are at 18.4. UK, which also isnt testing well, is at 28.8 Ones testing well: 111.8 to 314.8 Our reported numbers are most likely 1/6 of the actual numbers in the US. Or: 36,000 cases.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
We’re starting to test now, so the numbers will go up.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
And all that without normal testing.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
-
Yes. Exponential is 100% accurate, even without adequate testing.pic.twitter.com/ciT4n1KQg7
- Antwoorden weergeven
-
-
-
These are not growing numbers of infections. It's the numbers already here being slowly revealed through increased testing.
-
It's more from spread than testing. We're still way low on testing. You can tell by cases per million. We're at 18.4. UK, which also isnt testing well, is at 28.8 Ones testing well: 111.8 to 314.8. Our reported numbers are likely at least 1/6 of actual numbers in US. Or 36,000
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
@NotReallyLois and this is without much testing.Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.